Washington and Beijing .. Strategic Capabilities

The Chinese dilemma for the United States is unparalleled and unprecedented in terms of the challenges facing Washington since the nineteenth century.

The exceptionality of the Chinese dilemma lies in its intrinsic components, both natural and acquired. Beijing does not rely on other countries to support it. Not within international blocs in search of immunity and immunity. It is guided by a strict, ideologically centralized system of government; Harmonious with the social and economic values ​​of society. Political ideology is identical until it integrates with all sectors of life. A human mass is about three times the size of the American human mass.

It draws inspiration from all economic theories throughout history that helps it reach the highest levels of the global economic throne so far. It follows a cautious, flexible and deliberate policy on the international scene without compromising its prestige and prestige or the pillars of its strategic relations with major countries or major international blocs. It has its red lines in more than one area, which it considers to be within its areas of vital influence, and it has interests in it. Its development rates are constantly rising. Its historical, cultural, imperial, political and social heritage gives it many ways of exclusivity and exclusivity. It chose the economy as a way to build the growing internally and externally; She singled out her commercial fan to shade the whole world with her products.

It infiltrated most of the world markets through a decisive principle of providing each market with the commodities it desires according to its needs, capabilities, capabilities and income levels. With its merchandise production, it addressed the different tastes of consumers in the four corners of the earth. It managed to eradicate extreme poverty among its population of more than one billion people.

The US side realizes that China no longer poses a containable economic and trade challenge only, but also represents a major security challenge to its interests, based on two realities; The first: the enormous self-capabilities in all aspects. As for the second fact, it stems from the association of most of the world’s production wheel economically with the international trade movement in China, and this specifically represents a challenge no less complex and difficult for Americans than the rest of the other challenge factors, because it created a state of overlap and intertwining between Beijing’s interests And the interests of countries allied to Washington, and these countries are no longer in the process of relying on economic and commercial alternatives that meet their needs in order to waste their gains with China on the one hand, and they also seem to adhere to their options related to the low financial costs that they provide to their budgets on the other hand.

There is no doubt that the Biden administration’s options are limited in its quest to confront China, including excluding direct military confrontation with it. Wars may occur through proxies, and this does not end a problem nor resolve a fate. China does not appear to be in a state of anxiety, and its behavior and stances do not reflect an escalating tone, even though it is full of challenge and rejection of the American proposals. It does not show interest in most of the provocation attempts it is exposed to in the South China Sea, Hong Kong and some areas of its influence. Rather, it maintains a disciplined rhythm in expressing its positions. The most likely options tend towards developing joint strategies for understanding on the basis of achieving greater economic cooperation and studying some troubling security issues on each side, and focusing on creating opportunities for developing and revitalizing relations between them, especially since the two sides enjoy the two largest economies in the world with a bilateral trade volume of more than $560 billion. annually.

A comprehensive and final settlement between them is elusive due to multiple factors; The most prominent of which is the strength, ability, and ambitions of each party. Neither the Americans will accept China’s dominance at their expense, nor will the Chinese be ready to accept the second place in the world after the spread of their economic clouds and commercial ships in the world’s spaces and land.

Sino-US relations, in their various frameworks, have entered a new turning point. What is new about it is that each side puts its cards on the table without equivocations or agents, in the sense of moving from the backstage struggle to the stage and unveiling. The Americans are keeping track of files of “deep concern” due to China’s commercial, human rights and political behavior, with their readiness to discuss several issues, including North Korea, Afghanistan, Iran and human rights, and sometimes declare that they do not want conflict, but rather welcome competition.

The Chinese side takes advantage of every opportunity to vow to take resolute measures against American interference and declare that the United States is using its military power and financial power to impose long-term tutelage and suppress other countries, and that it misuses the so-called national security concepts to obstruct normal trade transactions and incite some countries to attack China.

There is no room to talk here about a cold war between the two most powerful poles on earth, and the proposition is not logically consistent with any such description. Rather, competition seems more complex than the means of any cold war. Alliances with regional and international blocs on the world stage, and Beijing as the largest human, economic and commercial force on the face of the globe, and it has alliances with well-established and influential international powers; Both of them constitute a balance for the balance of the world, and therefore it is very difficult to disrupt it or allow it to be disrupted because of the risks that this entails for everyone, including the American and Chinese parties.

China: US actions go against tide of history, rejected by international community

Beijing on Saturday described American democracy as a “weapon of mass destruction”, after the summit on democracy organized by US President Joe Biden to bring countries that share the same values ​​in the face of authoritarian regimes.

“‘Democracy’ has long become a ‘weapon of mass destruction’ used by the United States to interfere in other countries,” a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman said in a statement posted online, also accusing Washington of “provoking ‘color revolutions’ abroad.”

China was excluded from the two-day virtual summit, along with other countries such as Russia and Hungary, and openly accused the US president of stoking ideological divisions inherited from the Cold War.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman also said that the summit was organized to “draw lines of ideological prejudice, exploit democracy (…) and incite division and confrontation.”

China, for its part, vowed to “resist and resolutely oppose all kinds of pseudo-democracy”.

US President Joe Biden angered China by inviting Taiwan, not Beijing, to participate in a “summit for democracy” organized by Washington via video and that ended its work Friday.

In a white paper published last week aimed at bolstering its legitimacy, the increasingly authoritarian communist regime under Xi Jinping praised its own model of “integrated people’s democracy”.

Tensions between the world’s two largest powers have heightened in recent years, over trade and technology competition, human rights and over the issue of Xinjiang and Taiwan.

On Friday, the United States imposed sanctions on China, specifically targeting a Chinese face-recognition company accused of monitoring the Muslim Uyghur minority in Xinjiang.

And the vast Xinjiang region, which has long witnessed attacks, has been tightly controlled by Beijing for several years.

Human rights organizations say more than a million Uighurs have been detained in political rehabilitation centres.

But Beijing rejects this number and talks about vocational training centers aimed at keeping “trainees” away from extremism.

Antony Blinken warns China to stop ‘aggressive actions’ in Asia-Pacific

US secretary of state Antony Blinken has used a visit to Indo-Pacific to urge China to cease “aggressive actions” in the region, as Washington seeks to bolster alliances against Beijing.

President Joe Biden’s administration is trying to reset relations and reassert its influence in Asia after the turbulence and unpredictability of the Donald Trump era.

Blinken’s comments came in Indonesia, the first leg of a tour of south-east Asia, the latest visit to the region by a senior US official in recent months.

In a speech outlining the US approach to the Indo-Pacific, Blinken said Washington would work with allies and partners to “defend the rules-based order” and countries should have the right to “choose their own path”.

“That’s why there is so much concern – from north-east Asia to south-east Asia and from the Mekong River to the Pacific Islands – about Beijing’s aggressive actions.

“Claiming open seas as their own. Distorting open markets through subsidies to its state-run companies. Denying the exports or revoking deals for countries whose policies it does not agree with.”

“Countries across the region want this behaviour to change – we do too,” he said, during the speech at the University of Indonesia in Jakarta.

He added that Washington was “determined to ensure freedom of navigation in the South China Sea”, and said Beijing’s actions there threatened the movement of more than $3tn worth of commerce every year.

But Blinken also stressed that “it’s not about a contest between a US-centric region or a China-centric region – the Indo-Pacific is its own region”, and said Washington wanted to avoid conflict there.

China claims almost all of the resource-rich South China Sea, with competing claims from four south-east Asian states as well as Taiwan.

Beijing has been accused of deploying a range of military hardware including anti-ship and surface-to-air missiles there, and ignored a 2016 international tribunal decision that declared its historical claim over most of the waters to be without basis.

Blinken also said Washington wants to ensure “peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait”.

US-China tensions have soared over self-ruled, democratic Taiwan, which China claims as its territory and has vowed to retake one day, by force if necessary.

Blinken is seeking to highlight south-east Asia’s growing importance to US foreign policy on the trip, even as his administration has to contend with myriad other crises, from Iran to Russia.

Countries in the region face an increasingly tough task of trying to maintain good relations with both Beijing – a key trading partner – and Washington, vital to maintaining the region’s security.

Russia is also trying to assert its influence in the region.

After holding talks with Blinken on Monday, Indonesian president Joko Widodo met the Russian security council secretary, Nikolai Patrushev. After Indonesia, Blinken heads to Malaysia and Thailand.

The US-China relationship has deteriorated over a range of issues from cybersecurity and tech supremacy to human rights in Hong Kong and Xinjiang.

Biden has largely continued Trump’s hawkish stance on China, describing the Asian power as the pre-eminent challenge to the United States.

بلينكن يتهم بكين بـ”أعمال عدوانية” في بحر الصين الجنوبي

دعا وزير الخارجية الأميركي أنتوني بلينكن في جاكرتا الثلاثاء الصين إلى وقف “أعمالها العدوانية” في منطقة المحيطين الهندي والهادئ، وذلك خلال جولة هي الأولى له في جنوب شرق آسيا.

وقال بلينكن في كلمة بجامعة إندونيسيا “نحن مصممون على ضمان حرية الملاحة في بحر الصين الجنوبي، حيث تهدد أعمال بكين العدوانية تبادلات تجارية تزيد قيمتها على ثلاثة تريليونات دولار كل عام”.

كما أكد مجددا تمسك واشنطن بـ”السلام والاستقرار في مضيق تايوان” الذي بات أكثر من أي وقت مضى في صلب التوتر الشديد بين أكبر اقتصادين في العالم.

وشدد بلينكن على رغبته في تعزيز التحالفات مع دول المنطقة، متعهدا “حماية حق كل الدول في اختيار طريقها الخاص، بلا ضغط أو ترهيب”.

واعتبر أنه “ليست هناك منافسة” بين منطقة تتمحور حول الولايات المتحدة أو تتمحور حول الصين.

وقال “هناك كثير من القلق، من شمال شرق آسيا إلى جنوب شرق آسيا، ومن نهر ميكونغ إلى جزر المحيط الهادئ، بشأن أعمال بكين العدوانية”.