أفادت جهات رسمية إندونيسية، اليوم الأحد، إن حافلة اصطدمت بسيارات ودراجات نارية بعد عطل في فراملها في مقاطعة جاوة الغربية بإندونيسيا، مما أسفر عن مقتل 11 شخصاً على الأقل، معظمهم من الطلاب، وإصابة عشرات آخرين.
وقال المتحدث باسم شرطة جاوة الغربية، جولز أبراهام أباست، إن الحافلة التي كانت تقل 61 طالبًا ومعلمًا كانت عائدة من منطقة باندونغ الجبلية إلى مدرسة في ديبوك خارج العاصمة جاكرتا، في وقت متأخر من يوم السبت بعد احتفال التخرج.
وأضاف أن الحافلة خرجت عن السيطرة على طريق منحدر وعبرت الممرات، واصطدمت بعدة سيارات ودراجات نارية قبل أن ترتطم بعمود كهرباء.
وقال أباست إن تسعة أشخاص لقوا حتفهم في مكان الحادث وتوفي اثنان آخران في وقت لاحق في المستشفى، بما في ذلك مدرس وسائق سيارة من السكان المحليين.
أعلنت القوات المسلحة الباكستانية عن نجاح اختبار نظام صواريخ قصير المدى الذي تم تطويره محليًا، بهدف تعزيز قدرتها على ردع أي هجوم محتمل من الدولة المجاورة الهند.
وفقًا للبيان العسكري، يبلغ مدى الصواريخ 400 كيلومتر، وتمتلك هذه الصواريخ بميزات قابلة للمناورة وبنظام ملاحة حديث، ما يمنحها القدرة على التفاعل مع الأهداف العسكرية بدقة عالية واعتراض أنظمة الدفاع الصاروخي.
وقدم كل من رئيس الوزراء الباكستاني شهباز شريف والجيش تهنئة إلى للفريق العلمي والمهندسين وكل من ساهم في نجاح هذا الاختبار، وفقا لما جاء في نص البيان.
ويقوم الجيش الباكستاني باختبار إطلاق صواريخ كروز وأسلحة مطورة محلياً بشكل مستمر، في محاولة لإظهار قدرته على ردع أي تهديد محتمل من الهند.
وقد خاض الغريمان، المسلحان نووياً، ثلاث حروب ضد بعضهما البعض منذ استقلالهما عن الحكم الاستعماري البريطاني في عام 1947.
وصل الرئيس الروسي فلاديمير بوتين إلى الصين في زيارة دولة يلتقي فيها بالرئيس الصيني شي جين بينغ، في أول رحلة له بعد إعادة توليه الرئاسة للمرة الخامسة.
وكانت وزارة الخارجية الصينية قد قالت إن زيارة بوتين ستستغرق يومين. وتأتي هذه الزيارة بعد تقارب روسي صيني تعزز بين الحليفين.
وقال بوتين لوسائل إعلام صينية عشية الزيارة، إن موسكو منفتحة للتفاوض بشأن الحرب في أوكرانيا.
وكما أعلن الكرملين، أن بوتين سيلتقي نظيره الصيني في اليوم الأول من زيارته و”سيناقش زعيما روسيا والصين بالتفصيل مجموعة كاملة من القضايا المتعلقة بالشراكة الشاملة والتعاون الاستراتيجي، وسيحددان الاتجاهات الرئيسية لمزيد من التطوير الملموس للتعاون الروسي الصيني، وسيتبادلان أيضًا وجهات النظر المتعمقة بشأن القضايا الدولية والإقليمية”.
علاقات تجارية
خلال مقابلة مع وكالة الأنباء الصينية، قال بوتين إن العلاقات التجارية والاقتصادية بين بلاده والصين تتطور بسرعة، واعتبر أن ذلك يدلّ على “مناعة مستقرة في مواجهة التحديات الخارجية وظواهر الأزمات”.
وكشف بوتين عن أن حجم التجارة الثنائية بين البلدين يبلغ الآن نحو 20 تريليون روبل أو ما يقرب من 1.6 تريليون يوان (219 مليار دولار).
وأضاف أن الصين ظلت شريك روسيا التجاري الرئيسي على مدار 13 عاما، وقد صعدت روسيا إلى المركز الرابع في ترتيب النظراء التجاريين للصين عام 2023.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has arrived in China for a two-day state visit as the two countries look to further deepen a relationship that has grown closer since Moscow invaded Ukraine more than two years ago.
The visit comes days after Russia launched a new offensive in Ukraine’s northeastern Kharkiv region and as it claims advances on the 1,000km (600-mile) long front line, where Kyiv’s forces have been hampered by delayed deliveries of weapons and ammunition from the United States.
Broadcast live on state television, Putin’s motorcade of nearly 20 vehicles, escorted by a formation of motorcyclists dressed in ceremonial white uniforms, arrived outside Beijing’s Great Hall of the People at about 11am (03:00 GMT) where the Russian president was met by Chinese President Xi Jinping.
The two countries’ anthems were played to the accompaniment of a gun salute, before the two leaders walked along the red carpets that had been laid out in the vast square to review the troops in a welcoming ceremony that lasted nearly half an hour. A group of children lined up next to the orchestra jumped and cheered as Putin and Xi walked past.
In discussions later, Xi greeted Putin as an “old friend”. He told Putin that China and Russia’s relationship had stood the test of time and that they had provided each other with “strategic guidance” in their more than 40 meetings over the past decade.
“China is ready to work with Russia to stay each other’s good neighbour, good friend and good partner,” state news agency Xinhua reported quoting Xi. The two men are expected to continue discussions over tea and a walk in the park, Russia’s RIA Novosti news agency reported.
Putin and Xi declared a “no limits” partnership days before Putin sent his troops into Ukraine in February 2022. In March 2023, when Xi visited Moscow, he described a “new era” in the countries’ relationship, while in October, when Putin last visited Beijing, Xi spoke of the “deep friendship” between the two men.
Before the trip, 71-year-old Putin said his choice of China as his first foreign destination since being sworn in as president for a fifth term underlined the “unprecedentedly high level of the strategic partnership” between the two countries as well as his close friendship with Xi, who is 70.
“We will try to establish closer cooperation in the field of industry and high technology, space and peaceful nuclear energy, artificial intelligence, renewable energy sources and other innovative sectors,” Putin told Xinhua.
The two leaders will take part in a gala evening to celebrate 75 years since the Soviet Union recognised the People’s Republic of China, declared by Mao Zedong following the communists’ victory in China’s civil war in 1949.
Putin will also visit Harbin in northeastern China, a city with strong ties to Russia.
In his interview with Xinhua, Putin also appeared to give his backing to a 12-point Ukraine peace plan that Beijing released to a lukewarm reception on the first anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2023.
He said the proposals could provide the basis for discussions and that Moscow was “open to a dialogue on Ukraine”. He reiterated the long-held Russian position that “negotiations must take into account the interests of all countries involved in the conflict, including ours”.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said any negotiations must include a restoration of the country’s territorial integrity, the withdrawal of Russian troops from all Ukrainian territory, the release of all prisoners, a tribunal for those responsible for the aggression, and security guarantees for Ukraine.
Switzerland is convening a peace summit for Ukraine, focusing on Kyiv’s framework, next June. At least 50 delegations have already agreed to attend, but Russia has not been invited.
China claims to be neutral in the conflict but has not condemned Moscow for its invasion of a sovereign country.
Russia ‘useful’ for China
The Kremlin said in a statement that during their talks this week, Putin and Xi would “have a detailed discussion on the entire range of issues related to the comprehensive partnership and strategic cooperation” and set “new directions for further development of cooperation between Russia and China”.
The two countries have made clear they want to remake the international order in line with their visions of how the world should be.
Speaking on Tuesday, Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov claimed that Moscow and Beijing played a “major balancing role in global affairs”, and that Putin’s visit would “strengthen our joint work”.
Both countries are veto-holding members of the United Nations Security Council, alongside the United States, France and the United Kingdom.
“We should not underestimate Russia’s ‘usefulness’ as a friend without limits to China and Xi Jinping,” Sari Arho Havren, an associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) think tank, told Al Jazeera in an email. “Russia is a valuable partner in displacing the US and changing the global order to a favourable one for China and Russia alike. Russia also sees Taiwan as an integral part of China, and we have already seen speculation about the war scenario in the Indo-Pacific and whether Russia would step up to help and join China in possible war efforts.”
Moscow has forged increasingly close ties with Beijing, diverting most of its energy exports to China and importing high-tech components for its military industries from Chinese companies amid Western sanctions.
The two countries have also deepened military ties, holding joint war games over the Sea of Japan and the East China Sea, and organising training for ground forces in each other’s territory.
China has stepped up military activity around self-ruled Taiwan as the island prepares for the May 20 inauguration of William Lai Ching-te, who was elected president in elections in January.
China claims the territory as its own and has not ruled out the use of force to achieve its goal.
Chinese leader Xi Jinping welcomed Vladimir Putin to Beijing Thursday with a military band serenade and a multiple gun salute outside the capital’s Great Hall of the People, heralding the start of a two-day state visit set to underline the leaders’ close alignment as Russian troops advance in Ukraine.
The visit — Putin’s symbolic first overseas foray since entering a new term as Russia’s president last week – is a mark of Xi’s support for Putin and the latest sign of the deepening relations as the two bind their countries closer in the face of heavy frictions with the West.
During talks Thursday morning, Xi said China-Russian relations have “stood the test of a changing international landscape” and should be “cherished and nourished” by both sides, according to a readout from China’s Foreign Ministry.
“China is ready to work with Russia to stay each other’s good neighbor, good friend and good partner that trust each other, continue to consolidate the lasting friendship between the two peoples, and jointly pursue respective national development and revitalization and uphold fairness and justice in the world,” Xi said.
Putin hailed the countries’ “practical cooperation,” pointing to their record bilateral trade last year and China’s prominence as an economic partner for Russia, according to Russian state media Tass. The Russian president said energy, industry, and agriculture were among his cooperation priorities and the leaders had “already started talking” about this.
Putin’s red-carpet welcome to Beijing comes a day after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced via his office that he would halt all upcoming international visits, as his troops defend against a surprise Russian offensive in his country’s northeastern Kharkiv region.
The meeting in Beijing – Putin and Xi’s fourth time speaking face-to-face since Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 – comes amid mounting international concern about the direction of the war amid delays in aid to Ukraine and as Russia’s economy and defense complex appears unbowed by Western sanctions.
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken was in Kyiv earlier this week to reaffirm the Biden administration’s support for Ukraine after months of Congressional delay in approving American military aid to the embattled country. Blinken pledged $2 billion in foreign military financing and said much-needed ammunition and weapons are being rushed to the front lines.
Xi welcomes Putin under pressure from both the US and Europe to ensure soaring exports from China to Russia since the start of the war aren’t propping up the Kremlin’s war effort.
White House officials in recent weeks have confronted Beijing on what they believe is substantial support – in the form of goods like machine tools, drone and turbojet engines and microelectronics – from China for Russia’s defense industrial base. Beijing has slammed the US as making “groundless accusations” over “normal trade and economic exchanges” between China and Russia.
Discussions in Beijing
The war in Ukraine, as well as the conflict in Gaza, was expected to feature in Xi and Putin’s meetings in Beijing Thursday, alongside discussions on their expanding trade, security and energy ties.
Ahead of the trip, Putin hailed the “unprecedented level of strategic partnership” between the countries in an interview with Chinese state media Xinhua.
He said the leaders aimed to “strengthen foreign policy coordination” and deepen cooperation in “industry and high-tech, outer space and peaceful uses of nuclear energy, artificial intelligence, renewable energy and other innovative sectors.”
He also praised China’s “approaches to resolving the crisis in Ukraine.” Beijing has never condemned Russia’s invasion, rather it claims neutrality in the conflict. Ahead of an expected peace conference in Switzerland last month, Xi has called for peace talks that take both sides’ positions into account.
The two leaders – who declared a “no limits” partnership weeks before the February 2022 invasion and are known for their personal chemistry – have continued to strengthen their countries’ diplomatic, trade and security ties since the start of the war. Xi also visited Moscow in 2023 for his first international visit after entering his new term as China’s president.
Both leaders view the other as indispensable partners in their converging vision to reshape a world order they see as dominated by the United States and seeking to contain their rise. They are expected to discuss Russia’s hosting of the BRICS grouping later this year. The bloc, positioned as an alternative to the Western-backed G7, expanded earlier this year to include more members, including US-hostile Iran.
Xi and Putin are also set to sign a number of bilateral agreements, the Kremlin said earlier this week. They will celebrate 75 years of their diplomatic relations at a “gala event,” according to Chinese state media.
Besides meeting with Xi in Beijing, Putin is also expected to visit Harbin, the capital of China’s northeastern Heilongjiang province bordering Russia’s Far East, where he will attend trade and cooperation forums.
The region, historically a site of long simmering border tensions between the two neighbors, which erupted in conflict between China and the Soviet Union in 1969 – has seen increasing connectivity with parts of Russia’s Far East in recent years.
Putin is also expected to meet with the students and faculty of Harbin Institute of Technology, a university sanctioned by the US government in 2020 for its alleged role in procuring items for China’s military.
The authoritarian leaders aim to underscore their unity during the two-day state visit.
Vladimir Putin has arrived in Beijing for a two-day visit, with Chinese state media calling the Russian president an “old friend”.
Chinese leader Xi Jinping welcomed Russia’s number one with full military honours at the Great Hall of the People in the heart of China’s capital.
The trip – underscoring the close ties between the two autocratic leaders – comes as Moscow intensifies its offensive in Ukraine, with Ukrainian troops pulling back in Kharkiv on Wednesday.
Xi said the two countries were deepening their relationship as “good neighbours, good friends, good partners,” according to Chinese state broadcaster CCTV.
Beijing has emerged as a lifeline for Moscow as Western sanctions over the war in Ukraine have cut much of its access to international trade.
In July 2023, a US intelligence report alleged China had “probably” provided Moscow with key technology, including drones and fighter jet parts, it was using to wage war in Ukraine.
Before arriving in Beijing, Putin said in an interview with Chinese media that the Kremlin is prepared to negotiate over the conflict in Ukraine.
“We are open to a dialogue on Ukraine, but such negotiations must take into account the interests of all countries involved in the conflict, including ours,” the Russian leader was quoted as saying by the official Xinhua News Agency.
He also praised China for its initiatives aimed at “resolving the crisis in Ukraine”.
“Unfortunately, neither Ukraine nor its Western patrons support these initiatives,” claimed Putin. “They are not ready to engage in an equal, honest and open dialogue based on mutual respect and consideration of each other’s interests.”
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has said any negotiations must include a restoration of Ukraine’s territorial integrity, the withdrawal of Russian troops and security guarantees for Kyiv.
China claims to take a neutral position in the conflict, though experts previously told Euronews its stance is complicated, pushed and pulled in competing directions.
Beijing has backed Moscow’s contentious claim that Russia was provoked into attacking Ukraine by the West, despite Putin’s saying he wants to restore Russia’s century-old borders as the reason for his assault.
In their meeting after dawn on Thursday, China’s number one congratulated Putin on securing a fifth term in office.
Putin faced no credible opposition in the presidential race, and, like Xi, has not laid out any plans for any potential successors.
Russia’s forces have pressed an offensive in northeastern Ukraine’s Kharkiv region that began last week, marking the most significant border incursion since the full-scale invasion began in 2022
Ukrainian forces have withdrawn from positions in villages around Kharkiv, meanwhile almost 8,000 people have fled their homes.
The day after the flood waters hit, Noor Mohammed found the bodies of his family in the street and in the fields.
The 75-year-old had been just 100m away from his home in northern Afghanistan when he heard the deadly roar of water approaching.
Noor ran towards the house where his wife, sister, son and two of his grandchildren were resting.
But it was too late.
The sudden torrent of water swept away his family and home.
Flash floods hit on Friday, caused by a combination of unusually heavy storms following a dry winter, which has left the ground too hard to absorb all the rain. The destruction stretches for miles.
The World Food Programme says more than 300 people have died and 2,000 homes destroyed in the flooding, which affected five districts in the northern Afghan province of Baghlan. The number of casualties is expected to rise.
The provinces of Badakhshan, Ghor and western Herat were also severely damaged.
“I felt helpless,” Noor says.
Afghanistan floods: ‘I found my family’s bodies in the streets’
7 hours ago
By Yama Bariz and Caroline Davies,in Baghlan province, AfghanistanShare
The day after the flood waters hit, Noor Mohammed found the bodies of his family in the street and in the fields.
The 75-year-old had been just 100m away from his home in northern Afghanistan when he heard the deadly roar of water approaching.
Noor ran towards the house where his wife, sister, son and two of his grandchildren were resting.
But it was too late.
The sudden torrent of water swept away his family and home.
Flash floods hit on Friday, caused by a combination of unusually heavy storms following a dry winter, which has left the ground too hard to absorb all the rain. The destruction stretches for miles.
The World Food Programme says more than 300 people have died and 2,000 homes destroyed in the flooding, which affected five districts in the northern Afghan province of Baghlan. The number of casualties is expected to rise.
The provinces of Badakhshan, Ghor and western Herat were also severely damaged.
“I felt helpless,” Noor says.
It was early evening when he frantically searched the area around his home in the village of Gaz in Baghlan, but could not find any trace of his family.
He gave up at 01:00 and, in the middle of the night, walked to his daughter Saeeda’s house three hours away.
He returned home the next day and found the bodies of his family.
“It was devastating,” he says.
Noor says he has never experienced anything like it in his life – either from the natural disasters that frequently hit the area or the civil wars that have plagued the country.
Saeeda, whose 25-year-old daughter was one of Noor’s grandchildren who died, says the approaching storm sounded like a monster and they were terrified.
In Noor’s village, which is still inaccessible by road, most families have lost at least two or three relatives in the floods and are in desperate need of help.
“We have travelled to areas where everything is completely gone,” says Rouzatullah, a nurse who visited one of the worst-hit villages called Fullol with his team.
Uprooted trees, rocks, bricks and mangled cars stick out of the thick mud in Fullol. Once sticky with water, in the heat it has started to harden, making it even more difficult for those still digging, pulling out possessions.
Muhammad Gul is using a shovel to dig through the two rooms of his house.
“We haven’t got even a glass left for a cup of tea, there is nothing,” he tells the BBC. The only thing he has been able to salvage is a twisted bicycle which he loads onto a donkey.
Days after the flooding, some families are still searching for the bodies of their loved ones. At one house a crowd gathers. The body of a girl has been found; she is covered in a sheet and taken away by an ambulance.
Rouzatullah rushed to the area along with 15 other nurses, paramedics and doctors.
He says they helped more than 200 injured people, including one man who had lost 16 members of his family.
But they have not been able to reach some remote areas where people desperately need aid.
“There is no drinking water,” Rouzatullah says, warning there might be outbreaks of waterborne diseases such as typhoid and dysentery.
In the areas they have been able to reach, the team has started to set up mobile aid centres and are working to remove the dead bodies.
At each village the BBC is met with another story of loss.
One man shows us a picture of his five-year-old nephew, Abu Bakar. He was playing with his grandfather when the water hit. As they tried to escape, Abu Bakar was swept away. He had clung so tightly to his grandfather’s leg as he tried to save himself that he left a mark. His mother could only watch as he lost his grip.
Abdul Khaliq was out of town when he heard about the flood. By the time he returned, all that was left of his family’s houses was one small piece of bathroom wall. The rest is now flattened. Of 18 people, 10 of his family died, swept away.
“We were searching family members in knee-deep mud, so we took off our shoes and continued searching,” he says. “Eventually, we found their bodies miles away from here.”
Others tell of the moment disaster struck – a shout went out that water was coming. Some were able to get out of its path, but lost all their possessions.
“I struggled to reach the next floor amidst the chaos. Our home and all our livestock were swept away,” says Zuhra Bibi, who is now sleeping in a tarpaulin tent.
She says she’s never seen anything like this before in her lifetime. Flooding is not uncommon, but in 20, 40, 60 years, we are told, none have seen a flood like this in their area.
In the village of Gudan Bala, Mohammad Rasool is chain-smoking cigarettes next to a field where his crops once grew. Now the field is a pool of thick muddy water.
Acres of farmland – fields of cotton and wheat crops – have been completely destroyed. We drive through wheatfields that have been cut in two by the force of the water, ripping out the green stalks, leaving grey rubble behind.
Mohammad feels fortunate that his family has survived, but says he has lost everything else.
He shows me the fields where his crops have been ruined.
“This was the only source of income I had,” he says. “I feel helpless.”
Like 80% of Afghans, he depends on agriculture for his income. Mohammad says he is not sure how they will survive.
He points to the remains of his house in the distance. He cannot return because the flood waters are still too high.
“I don’t have anything now, what should I do? I have family to provide for but I have nothing.”
Even before the floods hit, the UN estimated that about 24 million people, more than half the population of Afghanistan, would need some form of humanitarian assistance this year.
It is not just crops that have been affected. Mohammed says his neighbour lost his two cows in the floods. They were the man’s only way of making a living.
And Noor, who is staying with his daughter, says the only possessions he has left are the clothes he is wearing. He had lived in the house that was swept away since he was a young boy – his father built it 65 years ago.
“I had hopes about the future,” he says. “My son and granddaughter were teachers and I was proud because they were contributing to the future of the country.”
Both are now dead. “The floods took everything,” he says.
Last week, President Joe Biden amplified a dangerous myth when he claimed that the Middle East has long harboured an “ancient hatred for Jews”. This assertion, made during Holocaust Memorial Week, suggests a fundamental misunderstanding of the region’s history. By alleging that Hamas is “driven by an ancient desire to wipe the Jewish people off the face of this earth”, Biden not only spreads falsehoods but also engages in a troubling revisionism of history. It is no exaggeration to suggest that the rhetoric of the US President serves to justify Israel’s genocidal actions in Gaza and its takeover of historic Palestine.
Biden’s statement effectively transposed the historical anti-Semitism prevalent in Europe and the ancient animosity toward Jews within Christendom onto the Middle East. How can Hamas, a group established in 1987 in response to Israeli occupation, be attributed to an “ancient hatred”, especially given the absence of a historical precedent for such animosity towards Jews in the Middle East compared to Europe?
In fact, for centuries, Jews found sanctuary and co-existence in Muslim-ruled lands while facing persecution in Europe. This fact is attested to even by some of the staunchest critics of Islam and Muslims. “The coming of Islam saved [Jews]”, an essay in the Jewish Chronicle concluded. The author goes on to state that Islam provided a new context in which Jews “not only survived, but flourished, laying foundations for subsequent Jewish cultural prosperity.”
The historical reservoir of anti-Semitism that led to the Holocaust did not originate in the Muslim world, but rather in Christian Europe. Contrary to Biden’s assertion of “ancient desires”, the Middle East, where the three Abrahamic faiths were born, was not the breeding ground for such sentiments. In fact, Muslims and Jews have a rich history of peaceful co-existence and mutual support, dating back to the time of Prophet Muhammad. As early as 622 CE, the Prophet ratified the constitution of Medina, a ground-breaking pact that unified Muslims, Jews and others into one community, as part of the Ummah, demonstrating a long-standing alliance and shared heritage.
In contrast, it was the Byzantine Christians who conquered Jerusalem in 629 and massacred and expelled Jews. When Muslims retook the city in 638, the Second Caliph, Umar Iban Al-Khattab, re-opened Jerusalem to Jews and allowed them to return, a policy that continued for centuries under Muslim rule. In fact, it is safe to assume that if it was not for the care and duty shown by Muslims to Jews, there would be no continuous Jewish settlement in Palestine to speak off.
It was the Crusaders, not Muslims, who massacred both Jews and Muslims when they captured Jerusalem in 1099. Yet, time and again, under various Muslims rulers, including the Ottomans, Muslims consistently allowed Jews to return to Jerusalem and live in peace after periods of Christian persecution. The Golden Age of Islam in Moorish Spain, as it is often called, is another testament to the long history of Muslims, Jews and Christians co-existing and thriving together under Muslim rule.
While no era was perfect, there is no historical evidence of generational Muslim campaigns to systematically oppress or murder Jews, let alone subject them to pogroms as was so often the case in Europe. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a modern political issue rooted in contemporary injustices, not an ancient religious feud fuelled by an ancient hatred for Jews, as claimed by Biden.
Any good-faith historian will acknowledge that, throughout various Muslim empires, many Jews flourished as scholars, doctors, merchants and government officials. The renowned Jewish philosopher, Moses Ben Maimon (1138–1204), also known as Maimonides, for example, served as a court physician to the legendary Sultan Saladin in Egypt. This pattern of Jewish integration continued under Ottoman rule, where Muslim leaders actively encouraged Jewish settlement in Constantinople. When the Sephardic Jews were expelled from Spain in 1492, they found a welcoming home in the Ottoman Empire.
Prior to the establishment of Israel and the rise of Zionism, the concept of an “Arab Jew” or a “Palestinian Jew” was not considered a contradiction in terms. The triumph of Zionism relied on creating a false dichotomy between Arab and Jewish identities, as Professor Avi Shlaim eloquently demonstrates in his memoir, “The Three Worlds of an Arab Jew.” Shlaim, an Iraqi Jew himself, sheds light on the historical reality that Jewish communities had thrived in Mesopotamia for over two millennia before the establishment of the State of Israel.
In his book, Shlaim underscores how Zionism’s success necessitated the portrayal of Arab and Jewish identities as inherently incompatible, despite the fact that Jews had been an integral part of the Arab world for centuries. This artificial division served to justify the Zionist narrative of the need for a separate Jewish homeland, while disregarding the long-standing co-existence and shared cultural heritage of Arabs and Jews in the region.
Why is Biden propagating such slander against an entire civilisation, particularly a falsehood that has long been a staple of the Zionist playbook to vilify and marginalise Palestinians? Anti-Semitism in the Middle East is a relatively modern occurrence, with much of what is labelled as anti-Jewish sentiment actually rooted in opposition to Israel and its colonial ambitions in historic Palestine. As recently as the early 20th century, Jewish communities thrived in places like Egypt and Iraq. However, the emergence of Arab nationalism, exacerbated by Israel’s takeover of Palestine, fuelled tensions between Jewish and Muslim populations.
It would be mendacious to ignore the fact that the trigger for growing tension between Jews and Arabs and the wider Muslim world was entirely due to the installation of a foreign and a colonial power in the heart of the Middle East. The establishment of Israel was predicated on erasing Palestine from the map and forcibly displacing its indigenous inhabitants. The resistance to this colonial enterprise stemmed not from an inherent hatred of Jews, but from a desire to oppose the subjugation and dispossession of the Palestinian people.
Perpetuating the myth of an “ancient hatred” between Muslims and Jews in the Middle East not only distorts history but also fuels the very conflict it claims to explain. By erasing the long, peaceful and complex history of co-existence, cultural exchange and mutual respect between Jews and Muslims, the misguided narrative fuelled by Biden only serves to justify the ongoing injustices and human rights abuses in the region. It is imperative that world leaders, especially President Biden, refrain from reinforcing these dangerous misconceptions and, instead, work towards fostering a more accurate understanding of the historical context that has shaped the current political realities.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.
يتواصل الحراك الطلابي الرافض للحرب على غزة في أنحاء العالم، حيث بدأ اعتصام جديد في جامعة كيوتو في اليابان، كما وسع طلاب جامعة كامبردج نطاق مخيم اعتصامهم، فيما استدعت جامعة بيرن السويسرية قوات الشرطة لفض اعتصام الطلاب.
وطالب المحتجون في جامعة كيوتو بإنهاء أي نوع من التعاون مع إسرائيل، ولا سيما الأبحاث العسكرية المشتركة.
وأقام الطلاب مخيمات للاعتصام في الجامعة، وقدموا مذكرة إلى إدارتها يحثون فيها رئيس الجامعة ناغاهيرو ميناتو على إدانة العنف ضد المدنيين الفلسطينيين علنا.
كما حث الطلاب إدارة الجامعة على إلغاء مذكرة تفاهم مع جامعة تل أبيب يتم بموجبها إجراء أبحاث عسكرية مشتركة، كما طالبوا بتقديم الدعم للطلبة الفلسطينيين.
ونقلت وكالة الأناضول عن طالب الدكتوراه في الجامعة ماساشي كاوانو قوله إن إدارة الجامعة توظف حراس أمن لمراقبة تحركات الطلاب وهناك حملات قمع متكررة، وفق تعبيره.
لكنه أضاف أن الوضع حتى الآن “ليس عدوانيا كما هو الحال في الولايات المتحدة أو أوروبا”، في إشارة إلى استدعاء قوات الشرطة لإنهاء المظاهرات الطلابية المؤيدة للشعب الفلسطيني.
شرطة سويسرا تتدخل
من ناحية أخرى، تحركت الشرطة السويسرية -فجر اليوم الأربعاء- لفض اعتصام الطلاب الرافضين للحرب في جامعة بيرن، وفقا لما أعلنته إدارة الجامعة.
وقال رئيس الجامعة كريستيان لومان في بيان نشر اليوم إنه مستعد لمواصلة الحوار مع الطلاب، لكنه وصف اعتصام الطلاب بالاحتلال وقال إن مطالبهم “ذات الدوافع السياسية” لا توفر إطارا لحوار بناء.
وكان حوالي 30 طالبا معتصمين في الجامعة عندما تدخلت الشرطة لطردهم قرابة الساعة 5 فجرا بالتوقيت المحلي (3 بتوقيت غرينتش)، وقد غادروا وهم يرددون شعارات مؤيدة للشعب الفلسطيني، وفقا لوكالة “كيستون إيه تي إس” للأنباء.
وجاء ذلك، بعدما تدخلت الشرطة السويسرية -أمس الثلاثاء- لفض اعتصام مماثل في جامعة جنيف، بناء على طلب إدارة الجامعة.
وكانت جامعة جنيف أجرت حوارا مع المتظاهرين، لكنها عادت وشددت لهجتها لاحقا بعد فشل المفاوضات، معلنة تقديم شكوى جنائية ضد الطلاب المؤيدين للفلسطينيين.
وبدأ الحراك الطلابي في سويسرا من جامعة لوزان وسرعان ما امتد إلى جامعات أخرى في أنحاء البلاد، من بينها فريبورغ وبازل وبيرن، فضلا عن معهدي البوليتكنيك العريقين في لوزان وزيورخ.
تصعيد في بريطانيا
وفي بريطانيا، وسع طلاب جامعة كامبردج نطاق مخيم اعتصامهم التضامني مع فلسطين بعد انتهاء مهلة منحوها لإدارة الجامعة من أجل تلبية مطالبهم.
وتوسع المخيم ليشمل إحدى المباني العريقة التي تحتضن حفلات تخرج الطلاب في الجامعة.
ويأتي هذا التصعيد قبل يومين فقط من حفلات التخرج وبعد أكثر من أسبوع على نصب خيامهم في حرم كلية كينغز التابعة للجامعة، كما يأتي بعد رفض إدارة الجامعة فتح قناة حوار مباشرة معهم رغم إقرارها بتسلم لائحة مطالبهم.
وأفاد مراسل الجزيرة بأن أعضاء من هيئة التدريس في جامعة كامبردج سلموا إدارة الجامعة رسالة تؤيد مطالب الطلبة المعتصمين.
وقال الأساتذة إنهم يدعمون بالكامل مطالب سحب استثمارات الجامعة من الشركات التي يقولون إنها متواطئة على جرائم الحرب الإسرائيلية.
وينادي الطلاب المحتجون في أوروبا بوقف الحرب الإسرائيلية على غزة وبالمقاطعة الأكاديمية للمؤسسات الداعمة لإسرائيل، رافعين الشعارات نفسها التي رفعها الطلاب في الجامعات الأميركية التي انطلقت منها شرارة الاحتجاجات في 18 أبريل/نيسان الماضي.
تحركات جديدة بأميركا
ولا يزال الحراك مستمرا في الجامعات الأميركية، حيث سيطر طلاب من جامعة كوني بمدينة نيويورك على مكتبة في أحد المباني التابعة للجامعة، وأطلقوا عليها اسم “مكتبة جامعة الأقصى” أسوة بأقدم جامعة عامة في غزة، وفق بيان لهم.
وأشار الطلاب المحتجون إلى أن الخطوة تأتي لتسليط الضوء على تورط الجامعة من خلال علاقاتها بجامعات إسرائيلية في استهداف الأساتذة وتدمير الجامعات في غزة.
وأضاف الطلاب أن الجامعة ترفض التفاوض معهم بشأن سحب استثماراتها ومقاطعة شركات سلاح ومراقبة وتكنولوجيا مرتبطة بجامعات إسرائيلية.
من ناحية أخرى، توصلت جامعة هارفارد لاتفاق مع الطلاب المحتجين لإنهاء اعتصامهم المؤيد للفلسطينيين.
وجاء قرار فض المخيم سلميا بعد مفاوضات بين رئيس الجامعة المؤقت وممثلي الاعتصام حيث وافقت إدارة الجامعة على البدء فورا في إعادة ما لا يقل عن 22 طالبا موقوفا عن الدراسة والبدء في مفاوضات بشأن التعاون بين جامعة هارفارد وإسرائيل.
Palestinians on Wednesday will mark the 76th year of their mass expulsion from what is now Israel, an event that is at the core of their national struggle.
But in many ways, that experience pales in comparison tothecalamitynowunfoldinginGaza.
Palestinians refer to it as the “Nakba,” Arabic for “catastrophe.”
Some 700,000 Palestinians — a majority of the prewar population — fled or were driven from their homes before and during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war that followed Israel’s establishment.
After the war, Israel refused to allow them to return.
Instead, they became a seemingly permanent refugee community that now numbers some 6 million, with most living in slum-like urban refugee camps in Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
Now in Gaza, the refugees and their descendants make up around three-quarters of the population.
Israel’s rejection of what Palestinians say is their right to return has been a core grievance in the conflict and was one of the thorniest issues in peace talks that last collapsed 15 years ago.
Now, many Palestinians fear a repeat of their painful history on an even more cataclysmic scale.
All across Gaza, Palestinians in recent days have been loading up cars and donkey carts or setting out on foot to already overcrowded tent camps as Israel expands its offensive.
The images from several rounds of mass evacuations throughout the seven-month war are strikingly similar to black-and-white photographs from 1948.
Mustafa al Gazzar, now 81, still recalls his family’s monthslong flight from their village in what is now central Israel to the southern city of Rafah, when he was 5. At one point they were bombed from the air, at another, they dug holes under a tree to sleep in for warmth.
Al Gazzar, now a great-grandfather, was forced to flee again over the weekend, this time to a tent in Muwasi, a barren coastal area where some 450,000 Palestinians live in a squalid camp.
He says the conditions are worse than in 1948, when the UN agency for Palestinian refugees was able to regularly provide food and other essentials.
“My hope in 1948 was to return, but my hope today is to survive,” he said. “I live in such fear,” he added, breaking into tears. “I cannot provide for my children and grandchildren.”
Israel’s brutal war on Gaza has killed over 35,000 Palestinians, according to local health officials, making it by far the deadliest round of fighting in the history of the conflict.
The war has forced some 1.7 million Palestinians — around three-quarters of the territory’s population — to flee their homes, often multiple times. That is well over twice the number that fled before and during the 1948 war.
The international community is strongly opposed to any mass expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza — an idea embraced by far-right members of the Israeli government, who refer to it as “voluntaryemigration.”
In Gaza, Israel has unleashed one of the deadliest and most destructive military campaigns in recent history, at times dropping 900-kilogram (2,000-pound) bombs on dense, residential areas.
Entire neighbourhoods have been reduced to wastelands of rubble and ploughed-up roads, many littered with unexploded bombs.
And that was in January, in the early days of Israel’s devastating ground offensives in Khan Younis and before it went into Rafah.
Yara Asi, a Palestinian assistant professor at the University of Central Florida who has done research on the damage to civilian infrastructure in the war, says it’s “extremely difficult” to imagine the kind of international effort that would be necessary to rebuild Gaza.
Even before the war, many Palestinians spoke of an ongoing Nakba, in which Israel gradually forced them out of Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem, territories it occupied during the 1967 war that the Palestinians wanted for a future state.
They point to home demolitions, settlement construction and other discriminatory policies that long predate the war, and which major rights groups say amount to “apartheid”.
Asi and others fear that if another genuine Nakba occurs, it will be in the form of a gradual departure.
“It won’t be called forcible displacement in some cases. It will be called emigration, it will be called something else,” Asi said.
“But in essence, it is people who wish to stay, who have done everything in their power to stay for generations in impossible conditions, finally reaching a point where life is just not livable.”
For Palestinians, ‘Nakba’ represents their mass expulsion from what is now Israel, an event that is at the core of their struggle.
Palestinians mark 76 years of dispossession on Wednesday amidst fear of a repeat of their painful history.
Palestinians refer to the day as the “Nakba,” which is the Arabic word for catastrophe.
Around 700,000 Palestinians – much of the pre-war population – fled or were driven from their homes before and during the 1948 war that followed Israel’s establishment.
Following the Israeli victory, Israel refused to allow the Palestinians to return to avoid a Palestinian majority within its borders.
Instead, the group formed a seemingly permanent refugee community with a population of around 6 million today. Most live in impoverished camps in Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and the West Bank.
The refugee camps have always been a bastion of Palestinian militancy.
Israel’s rejection of what Palestinians say is their right to return has been a core grievance in the conflict.
The war on Gaza, which started following the 7 October attack on Israel, has killed more than 35,000 Palestinians, according to local health officials.
It is by far the deadliest round of fighting in the long conflict.
Ireland will recognise a Palestinian state before the end of this month if not on May 21 as first thought, Irish Foreign Minster Micheal Martin said on Wednesday.
EU members including Ireland, Spain, Slovenia and Malta had planned to make the recognition next week, arguing that a two-state solution is essential for lasting peace in the region.
“We will be recognising the state of Palestine before the end of the month,” Mr Martin told Newstalk radio. “The specific date is still fluid because we’re still in discussions with some countries in respect of a joint recognition.”